Corries Solicitors - Personal Injury Specialists - FREEPHONE 0800 655 6550


Asbestos claims -“Sea change” in the law may make claims easier

Asbestos claims could be easier if a recent case is used by asbestos victims and their lawyers.

Corries asbestos team welcome a common sense decision by a court for a claim for asbestos compensation. It is hoped this will help other asbestos victims in the future.

Asbestos claims – case law

Corries asbestos claim team agree that it is harder for asbestos victims to make claims. There has been a hardening by the courts in dealing with asbestos mesothelioma cases in particular. They are not usually straightforward and need careful handling for a good outcome.

In recent years cases involving asbestos exposure before 1965, or low-level asbestos  exposure, are often rejected. Other cases where the evidence is not clear are being given short shrift by the courts. Many victims are denied compensation at court or are having to avoid making claims where prospects do not look good.

A recent appeal has been granted on a failed claim of Bussey which we hope will be heard in the next 6 – 12 months.

Asbestos Claims  – The Facts

The recent court decision of Oldman v DEFRA has shown that courts can deal sensibly with these issues.

In this case the late Mr Oldman had been had been employed by the Defendant’s deference predecessor, the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF). Between 1946 to 1950 he worked as a coach builder. In 1951 he joined MAFF on a fishery research steamboat where he trained as an engineer. He worked with and up close with asbestos lagged pipes and equipment.

Mr Oldman stayed in this work until he retired as a Marine engineer in 1983. He continued working for MAFF as a nightwatchman until 1991.

At the age of 84 he started to suffer with chest problems. He was then diagnosed with pleural thickening. At the time, when questioned by his doctors, he was not sure of exposure to asbestos.

asbestos ship engine
Asbestos claims from ship engine workers are common

Following later thought, when applying for disability benefit, he completed forms confirming he had not worked directly with asbestos but would have been exposed to it.

In the claim for compensation the court did not accept that Shipbuilding Regulations which were in place in 1961 applied to his work. Later Asbestos Regulations made in 1969 were not considered relevant.

However the judge looked at the case as a common-law claim for compensation. He confirmed that the regulations were relevant about the state of knowledge of asbestos by companies and the good asbestos practices that they should have had in place.

The court found that the defendants did not do enough to reduce the asbestos to a practical level and the case was found in Mr Oldman’s favour.

What will this mean for asbestos claims?

Corries Director and asbestos claims specialist Howard Bonnett commented

“This decision is hopefully a “sea change” in the way in which courts will look at asbestos and mesothelioma cases.

For the last seven years or so mesothelioma victims have taken cases to court and hit stony ground. Decisions about going to trial have been made difficult and to insurers’ advantages. I truly hope this commonsense judgement, along with the appeal on Bussey, will reverse the tide back into asbestos victim’s favour before any more die without compensation.

My team and I will be keeping a close eye on case developments.  Being up to date and aware of ever changing case law is more important than ever.”

Do you know someone who could make an asbestos claim?

 If they have been diagnosed with asbestos disease in the last three years (including lung cancer) we may be able to help. Call our friendly team for a no obligation discussion on 0800 083 7839. Your call is confidential and we are always happy to help.


Client Testimonials

£28,000 Awarded

Gloria Langton

“I don’t think I could have coped without you and your professionalism especially on the day of the final inquest which was particularly harrowing for me. Your kindness and patience towards my father whilst he was ill was also very much appreciated.  I have and will continue to recommend you to friends, colleagues and family for your services.”


£19,000 Awarded

Ms Meakin

“I am very happy that this claim is now finally settled and thank you so much for the service you provided. It was exemplary. And you have been most patient with my numerous phone calls.”

£118,000 Awarded

Ms F Johnson

“I would like to thank you for your kindness to my Mother Marion Harrison during the last months regarding the claim against the MOD due to Roy’s untimely passing. Roy was one of the finest men I have ever known. Mum has appreciated all your efforts and expertise on her behalf. Thank you.”

£90,000 Awarded

Mrs V Rogers

“On behalf of Adrian and myself I would like to thank you very much for your help and endeavours to reach this satisfactory outcome.”

£22,500 Awarded

Mrs Andrews, Hertfordshire.

“I am delighted to confirm receipt of our cheque concluding our case. Thank you so much for your support throughout the process. I have really appreciated your balanced guidance and sensitivity which gave me the confidence to pursue the claim. Hopefully we won’t need your services again but if we do we will certainly be in contact! So thank you again and wishing you every success in the future.”

£55,000 Awarded

Charles & Ann Parker, Bracknell.

“Ann and I want to thank you very much for all your hard work in the successful conclusion of my case. It has been a great pleasure, once again thank you for everything”

£1,024 Awarded

Pamela Tegg, Southampton.

“I thank you most sincerely for all the effort you put in on my behalf. I hope your employers are proud of the fact you work so efficiently and to such high standards.”

£9,000 Awarded

Keith Aston, Bristol.

“Thank you for the cheque for £9,000 in settlement of my claim. Fingers crossed there will not be any further accidents; however I would like to thank you for the professional manner you dealt with my accident claim. The most important part of a solicitors job is communication and I must thank you for the way you kept me updated on what was going on.”

£130,000 Awarded

June Abbott, York.

“Thank you for handling Peters claim and getting settlement.”


£20,000 Awarded

Anthony Richards, Hull.

“It was always nice talking to you. You were always there! And made me feel secure and important for the few moments.”


Tel: 0800 655 6550 | Fax: 01904 527431 |

Corries Solicitors Ltd, Melroses Yard, Walmgate, York, YO1 9XF. Registered number: 5517012. Corries Solicitors Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under number: 424101. Corries are licenced by the Office of Fair Trading under the consumer credit act 1974 Ref No: 656678/1